As readers of this blog know, I’m a writer as well as a private investigator. Several years ago, my mystery novel The Zen Man was reviewed on various book blog and review sites. During this book blog tour, I met some fantastic people who write well-crafted, critical book reviews, such as Elizabeth A. White.
During that tour, I also learned a few lessons about what I should have done before requesting a review from certain sites.
Lesson #1: Potential Reviewers Are Like Potential Clients
It’s smart to know ahead of time with whom you are dealing. If a reviewer says, “I don’t have the time to read your book, but how about my husband/cousin/mother reviews it instead?”
Don’t immediately say yes.
Whenever I need to subcontract case work to another investigator, I first discuss it with my client, a conversation in which I also provide the background and skills of the proposed subcontractor-PI. Besides my being responsible for the subcontractor’s work product, I want to ensure my client is comfortable with the new PI.
Just as I want my clients and subcontractors to be a good fit, it’s important for a writer to know if a potential reviewer is a good fit for the story before submitting a book.
Which brings us to the next lesson…
Which means a reviewer should have the ability to read a book critically, infer and synthesize meaning, and write about the story and characters in a coherent, accurate and grammatically correct manner. The last thing a writer wants is a badly written, grammatically incorrect book review.
In my investigations business, I write reports all the time — reports to clients, to other investigators if we are working a case together, to attorneys. It is critical that my reports are concise, comprehensible, accurate and well written. Why well written? Similar to a book review, a PI’s report is fundamentally a persuasive document. If it is hampered by misspellings, misused punctuation, awkward word choices, illogical organization, etc., the reader — who might be an attorney or a juror — might have concerns over the intelligence and communicative skills of the PI, which taints that investigator’s credibility.
Same with a badly written book review. If it is riddled with grammatical mistakes and sloppy writing, both the reviewer and review lack credibility.
Lesson #3: It’s Not Your Role to Play Editor
Back to my book blog tour several years back…when a reviewer told me she was overwhelmed with projects and could her husband review my book instead, I said sure. She and I both made mistakes in that conversation. She didn’t offer more information about him, and I didn’t ask questions.
Nightmare on Review Street
Ever have a dream when suddenly the skies turn dark and ominous and hideous creatures are creeping around, and you want desperately to wake up but can’t?
Reading a butt-ugly review is like that.
He kicked off his review saying he hadn’t really written that many book reviews (considering he misspelled reviews, I figured he hadn’t written any, ever). There were so many misspellings and slaphappy wordings, I wondered if he wrote it on the back of a cocktail napkin while tossing back another brewski on bowling night.
I considered contacting his wife and asking her to please fix the review, but if she hadn’t looked over her husband’s kinda-sorta review the first time, would she bother to look now? Did she even care? I decided to save myself a frustrating exercise in communication and let it go.
I should have followed lessons #1 and #2 before submitting my book to that site.
If I subcontract work to another investigator, and he/she forwards me a badly written report, I correct the report before forwarding it elsewhere. Afterward, I discuss the changes I made with the investigator so we can set expectations for future reports. But to be honest, if an investigator can’t write reasonably well, I don’t subcontract with that investigator again.
Bottom line: Whether it’s an investigative report or a book review, it all comes down to credibility.
All rights reserved by Colleen Collins. Any use of this content requires specific, written authority.
Praise for The Zen Man
"Great humor. Great dialogue. Author did a great job of establishing the relationship between Rick and Laura. It never overshadowed the mystery, but it made the book truly multi-dimensional."
~New York Times best-selling author Dorien Kelly
"A real page turner. I enjoyed this book full of suspense and surprises. I have never read this author before but will look for her next surprise."
Interviews & Articles
2015 Aspen Gold Award Winner
"I loved The Zen Man and really had fun catching Rick and Laura's first case in the prequel, The Ungrateful Dead. These novels have everything I love in a mystery: smart dialogue, a flawed hero, a little romance and a great plot. Murder at a coroners conference? What could be more fun!"
~ Nancy Warren USA Today Bestselling Author of The Toni Diamond mysteries